State Rep. Matt Marshall reflects on first session

‘Fighting for our constitutional rights’: Army veteran and physician assistant talks gun laws, health care, parent rights, working across the aisle and past controversies

Posted

State Rep. Matt Marshall welcomes differing opinions; they’re easy to come by when you’re a first-year Republican representative in a Democrat-led state Legislature.

“I am not somebody looking to surround myself with people that just agree with me,” Marshall, 40, told the Nisqually Valley News during a phone conversation Tuesday, April 8.

He’s heading toward the end of his first legislative session in a seat long held by former state Rep. and House Minority Leader J.T. Wilcox, who retired last year. He beat out former Sheriff John Snaza to earn the position.

“The way I learned, the way that I help refine my perspective on politics and the world and life in general, is by having opposing opinions and really internalizing that, digesting that and modifying my own world viewpoint, ” he said.

In his first session, at least, Marshall’s core politics remain conservative.

As one of two Republican representatives serving the largely rural Washington Legislative District 2 — with the other being Rep. Andrew Barkis, R-Olympia — Marshall is outspoken against new taxes. He believes soft-on-crime policies, not lawful gun ownership, are the primary reasons for gun violence. And he laments the state Democratic Party’s “stripping away” of provisions related to Initiative 2081, known as the Parents’ Bill of Rights, which granted parents and guardians the right to review school materials and records and opt out of activities like sexual-health education.

Marshall said the Democrats’ decision to approve the initiative “untouched” last year allowed their representatives to introduce House Bill 1296 in 2025, which created a “student bill of rights” that is “driving a wedge” between parents and students and eliminating true parental oversight.

“And that’s completely against the spirit of the initiative,” Marshall said. “So it’s a really frustrating spot for really everybody because clearly we all want students to be in an environment where they can learn, they can focus on reading, writing and arithmetic, growing up, going through this very difficult phase of their life as they enter adulthood, but also ensure that parents have access to the information that students are being taught and parents can really be, not just involved, but the one guiding how their child is raised.”

Had the Democratic Party not taken action last year, Marshall said, the initiative would’ve gone to a vote of the people.

“And if the people would have passed it, then the Legislature is not allowed to touch it for a period of years, I think it’s two or three years that nothing in that initiative can be amended or changed by the Legislature,” he said.

Proponents of HB 1296 argued the changes were necessary to align the initiative with state and federal law, while establishing protections against retaliation for school district employees who support students’ legal rights. Sponsor Rep. Monica Stonier, D-Vancouver, said the bill was about making sure “all students have a safe and supportive learning environment so they can thrive.”

HB 1296 passed in the House with a vote of 56-37 on March 12. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1296 passed in the Senate with a vote of 30-19 on April 11.

As reported by Jeanie Lindsay of KUOW Puget Sound Public Radio, the Senate-approved bill creates a new list of rights and anti-discrimination protections for students, including those who identify as LGBTQ+. Now amended, the bill must be resubmitted back to the House.

Along with many state Republicans, Marshall has also been critical of recent firearms legislation, like HB 1163, which he says puts yet another target on the lawful gun owner. HB 1163 mandates a stricter permitting process that includes certified firearms safety training, fingerprint submission and a background check by the Washington State Patrol.

“Right now, we have some pretty restrictive gun laws already in the state of Washington,” Marshall, an Army veteran and gun owner, said. “Nobody can legally purchase a firearm in the state without a pretty extensive background check. If it’s a semiautomatic or if it’s a pistol, there’s also a large wait time. We have some very restrictive regulations that already, in my opinion, go well beyond the scope of Article 1, Section 24 of the Washington Constitution, as well as the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. However, with all of these restrictions on lawful gun owners, violence and assaults and murders and everything else with guns is continuing to rise in the state of Washington.”

Drawing from FBI data, the Washington State House Republicans reported that violent crime increased “by nearly 20% in just five years” from 2018 to 2022, putting it just below the national average of 380.7 crimes reported to law enforcement agencies per 100,000 people. As Axios Seattle noted, however, the state average is still well below its peak in the early 90s.

The main reason for the recent uptick, says Marshall? Gang violence and organized crime from unlawfully obtained firearms.

Marshall has a plan to address the problem by instituting what he calls a “bounty on unlawful firearms.” The cosponsored bill would allow a person who has knowledge of a felon with a gun — or someone who does not have a legal right to own a firearm due to other criminal activity — to report them. Once the gun is recovered, Marshall said, the person would receive a reward.

“And if that firearm had been used in crimes, the bounty, essentially, on the illegal firearm would increase. And it’s a way to actually address the gang violence and the gun crime by getting these unlawful guns off the street and leaving the law-abiding citizen alone,” he said.

Annual data from Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) showed that violent crime decreased 5.5 percent in 2023 compared to 2022. Murders were also down — but still significantly higher compared to 2019.

The bill did not receive a hearing this session.

Despite these obstacles, Marshall has enjoyed early, largely bipartisan, success.

His first bill, House Bill 1190, was signed into law by Gov. Bob Ferguson on Monday, April 7. According to Marshall, HB 1190 was the first House Republican bill signed by Ferguson — ever.

The bill gives psychological and mental health counselor associates access to the Health Evidence Resource for Washington State (HEAL-WA) at the University of Washington Health Sciences Library. Marshall said he was honored to have it signed.

“The HEAL Washington Library provides up-to-date research, continuing medical education credits — it’s really just this vast resource that these professionals would otherwise have to pay for each individual article or piece of information they accessed,” Marshall said.

“We already have this library available to physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, psychologists, but some of the psychological associates didn’t have access, so this bill gives them access, mainly because they’re already paying for it as part of their license fees, and it’s only going to help the residents of Washington by making sure that all our mental health professionals have as much information as they desire,” he said.

Marshall’s professional career is varied, and rooted in medicine. His first job out of high school was as a firefighter EMT in Oregon. He fell in love with medicine but couldn’t afford the pre-med schooling.

“My parents did not have the ability to support my college,” Marshall said.

So he joined the Army as a combat medic, specialized as a lab tech, and later attended physician assistant school through the military. Marshall received his master’s degree in physician assistant studies from the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

Marshall said his experiences have allowed him to understand the “push and pulls” for medical providers and ancillary support staff, along with the struggles of patients.

“I’m trying to make this more cost effective for the state of Washington for the people here so they can get high quality care and not have it completely bankrupt them,” Marshall said. “And there is a frustration because there are a lot of outside influences, you know, just basic medical supplies cost a ton of money now because of shipping costs and potentially now tariffs, lots of people in the middle that all have their hand out taking a little piece of that supply that moves along the chain. Everything is marked up on the supply side, plus we have rising costs for personnel — just an employee is now costing a ton. Unfortunately, because we’re in budget crises, the reimbursement rates to providers is decreasing.”

According to Marshall, this combination of forces has pushed older and more experienced providers out of medicine, a trend that was most pronounced during COVID.



“They didn’t want to deal with that stress and the increased regulation and we’re still reeling from that.”
Solutions aren’t simple; Marshall says there are “thousands of variables in this problem.”

When asked about tariffs, Marshall was quick to express support for President Donald Trump, but said he was “a little bit nervous” about imposing large tariffs as a blanket policy across the globe. He sees the strategy as a possible negotiating tactic, but wasn’t willing to say whether he is for or against the tariffs at this stage.
“However,” Marshall said, “I am nervous that with the cost of everything already being so high and the struggle that the residents of the Second District and the state of Washington and really the United States, the struggle we’re having right now with just making ends meet, that this may (be) an additional insult that’s going to make things tough for a while.”

He added that Democrats are only going to make it worse.

“I think it’s a little bit hypocritical for the left to be screaming about the tariffs at the same time that they’re instituting record tax increases on the state of Washington,” he said.

Despite criticisms of Democratic policy, of which he has many, Marshall was open about his bipartisan support for HB 1190, which passed unanimously in both the House and Senate, along with another Democrat-cosponsored bill that would have amended filing deadlines in the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission (PDC), “in the effort of increasing transparency during elections.”

Furthermore, Marshall said he’s signed onto a number of Democratic bills, because it was “the right thing to do,” and that he’s willing to work across the aisle — at least with more moderate Democrats.

“The problem is there is a large contingent on the other side of the aisle that is unwilling to negotiate even a little bit, unwilling to even hear the other side and immediately resorts to name calling and labeling, which just shuts down a conversation,” Marshall said. “So even of the best laid plans, the good negotiations that could happen, get shut down by some of the more extremes really on their side of the aisle. On our side, we have to either converse and cooperate to get something done or just, you know, sit in our camp and talk and really effectively get nothing done because we’re in a very large minority.”

In a Washington State Democratic Party press release dated Jan. 13, Marshall was described as an Ultra-MAGA White Christian Nationalist who defended the “disgraced” former representative Matt Shea.

Shea garnered controversy, and FBI scrutiny, back in 2018 for distributing a document titled the “Biblical Basis for War” which outlined surrendering terms that included no abortions and no same-sex marriage.

Yet, at times, Marshall, a former Eatonville school board member, speaks in an almost unifying tone.

“At the end of the day, I think that whether somebody supported me or I supported them in the past, regardless of politics, I think that on 90-plus percent of issues we agree,” Marshall said.

The sentiment may seem surprising to those familiar with Marshall’s history as the founder and former president of Washington Three Percenters, a nonprofit organization whose primary goal, Marshall says, was supporting homeless veterans in the state of Washington.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has described “Three Percenterism” not as a group, “but a sub-ideology or common belief that falls within the larger antigovernment militia movement.” Washington Three Percent is not listed as one of the movement’s key organizations on the SPLC website.

As he’s said before, Marshall was motivated to “start something that would get back to where somebody could knock on their neighbor’s door and borrow an egg or a cup of flour.” The idea, he says, was to create a public service organization.

“We did a Christmas Eve turkey feed in downtown Olympia for just the homeless in general, where we fed 50 whole, deep-fried turkeys and all the sides in Sylvester Park,” Marshall said. “That was a great event and it was very well attended. (We) also had multiple boot drives where we would get winter boots and deliver them to homeless veterans up at next to Seattle and American Lake VA when we could find them.”

Only Marshall knows whether his recollections on the origins of the Washington Three Percenters are strictly accurate, or perhaps imbued with rosy retrospection — except others involved in those early discussions. What’s clear today is that Marshall publicly rejects the association to other groups with similar names, and he’s done it for years.

He also hasn’t forgotten the media coverage, which he says either focused solely on the group’s gun-rights rallies or lumped them in with other “crazy right wing extremist organizations.”

“I still remember some news articles here in Washington that were talking about how I’m directly connected with people that murdered police in Las Vegas ... that had three percent patches,” Marshall said. “And I’ve been grouped in with this Three Percent Security Force out of Georgia that have a very racist undertone in their leadership down there — never had any connections with any of them.”

On top of that, Marshall said, Washington Three Percenters didn’t exist at the time of those incidents, nor was he aware of what Three Percent was, still serving active duty in the Middle East.

“I wholeheartedly reject any ties to the violence that has ever happened … in connection with a Three Percent ideology and that’s never been, nor will it ever be, what the Washington Three Percent is or was about,” he said.

Then why use — and then keep — the name?

“I have for a long time now kind of questioned my decision on whether or not following suit with the Three Percent name was the best course of action,” Marshall said.

He said he brought the question to his board multiple times.

“And we decided that we wanted to keep the name because, one, everybody else in our opinion was just a Facebook club where people would buy patches online,” he said. “We’re the only ones actually doing something in the country, actually having a physical presence into our communities.”

Marshall said he’s been completely removed from the organization for about three years; he wishes them well and hopes they can continue to serve Washington state’s veteran population. And though he didn’t bristle when asked about his involvement with the Washington nonprofit, Marshall’s focus isn’t on the past — it’s what he can do for the rest of this legislative session and beyond.

“I’d say my goals the rest of the session are to oppose all these new tax increases,” Marshall said, adding that Washington state needs to cut its spending.

“Right now, what the people of the Second (Legislative) District do not need, and people in Washington do not need, is more taxes. And so, I will be fighting to oppose every single tax increase regardless of the purpose because we need to be more fiscally responsible, we do not need to raise taxes,” he said.

“Next year and moving on,” Marshall continued, “I think that crime, homelessness, addiction, the fentanyl crisis, I think all of this comes back to an underpinning of mental health and, specifically, not having enough mental health providers and services in the state of Washington, and not holding people accountable for committing crimes.”

He concluded with another core, at this point familiar, Republican issue: gun rights.

“I’m always going to be fighting for our constitutional rights, and anything I can do to repeal the unconstitutional gun restrictions and regulations on the law-abiding gun owner I will continue to do,” he said.

To view the bills Marshall is working on this legislative session, visit www.legiscan.com/WA/people/Matt-Marshall/id/26294.