Rainier School District Superintendent Bryon Bahr addressed the district’s financial challenges in a presentation titled “School Funding in Washington State” at the Rainier School Board meeting on Wednesday, April 23.
The presentation came after the board of directors detailed the reduction in force previously approved on March 19. Known as Reduction in Forces Resolution 299, the resolution authorized the district to eliminate positions due to budget cuts, enrollment changes and other financial constraints.
As part of the RIF, four positions will not be returning next year, including two classified paraprofessional positions and two Rainer Education Association certificated staff positions.
According to the April 23 board meeting agenda, the two classified paraprofessional positions were “completed through attrition.”
Superintendent Bahr confirmed to the Nisqually Valley News that both individuals left voluntarily.
One certificated staff member position was held by a “retire-rehire,” which generally signifies an employment that is short-term, temporary or part-time.
The final certificated staff member position, held by a high school science teacher, was eliminated due to the reduction in force.
The board did not vote on the specifics of the staff reduction in force.
During the audience input portion of the meeting, Annette Gavette expressed concern over not being able to hear the “school’s side of the story” in regards to the reduction in force, after reading a previous story in the Nisqually Valley News.
“My property taxes have doubled since 2022,” Gavette said. “Fortunately, I’m in a position where I can afford it, but I’m concerned about other people who continue to have their taxes go up when they have just one income and so I just feel that there needs to be an explanation since the levees did pass, and I think, with that, we all assumed that the school was (in) pretty solid shape since you got all the money that you asked for.”
Gavette concluded by saying she hoped for more transparency and communication from the board to the community when there are issues that residents would want to know about.
Board Chairman Jerry Sprouffske thanked Gavette and, while noting that the board doesn’t typically comment on audience input as a matter of policy, alluded to Superintendent Bahr’s forthcoming presentation, and said that money from the capital levy cannot be moved to fund staff.
In 2024, local taxpayers approved two separate levies to support funding for the school district: Proposition 1, an educational programs and operations levy; and Proposition 2, a capital levy for safety, security and maintenance repairs.
Proposition 1 was wide-ranging. The four-year EP&O levy provided funding for not only athletics, extracurriculars, remediation, and special education, but also transportation, food services, teachers, classified staff, administration, custodial staffing, students with special needs, low-income students and more. Rainier School District taxpayers voted to pay approximately $2.50 per $1,000 of assessed property value.
As reported by the Nisqually Valley News, some employees were disappointed after the board voted to approve the reduction in force.
“Our levies passed, one of which was to keep classified employees employed, [so] where is that money being spent?” a Rainier School District employee, who wished to remain anonymous, told the Nisqually Valley News in March. “We have options that could work instead of cuts but they are not being considered.”
To open his presentation on how school funding works in Washington state, Commissioner Bahr acknowledged — and took responsibility — for confusion with the community and some board members.
“School funding is very, very difficult to understand,” Bahr said, before explaining the state requirements that dictate how the district can spend its money from the levies.
Bahr said the Washington state’s prototypical school funding model, which is used to provide funding based on enrollment and staffing assumptions, helps ensure consistency across the state’s schools, but it is both outdated and does not always reflect the unique needs of small school districts like Rainier.
“We have needs like (Advanced Placement) classes,” Bahr said. “We have needs for more teachers… for the specialists so our kids have more enrichment kinds of things. And so that’s why the formula doesn’t work. And it’s 15 years old. So, 15 years ago, are you making the same amount of money as you were making 15 years ago? No, you’re not. But the state is still paying us at that rate for 15 years ago.”
Bahr explained that the EP&O levy, which is voted on every four years, is used to collect money from community property taxes, paying for programs, staff and learning support that the state doesn’t fully cover.
“It’s an enrichment levy, and it’s supposed to help us with special ed, sports, art and teacher salaries,” Bahr said. “This money is for day-to-day expenses to keep schools running.”
Capital levies, on the other hand, are used as a “way of not having to go out for a bond,” Bahr said, adding that this money is normally used for repairs needed to upgrade buildings based on the “efficiency rate” decided on by the state through the Clean Building Act, though the state doesn’t provide the district money to do the repairs.